The article has been automatically translated into English by Google Translate from Russian and has not been edited.
Переклад цього матеріалу українською мовою з російської було автоматично здійснено сервісом Google Translate, без подальшого редагування тексту.
Bu məqalə Google Translate servisi vasitəsi ilə avtomatik olaraq rus dilindən azərbaycan dilinə tərcümə olunmuşdur. Bundan sonra mətn redaktə edilməmişdir.

Scientists tested the effectiveness of 14 types of face masks: study findings

Bandanas and knitted masks are among the least effective protective face covers for preventing the spread of the coronavirus, according to a new study. Writes about it New York Post.

Photo: Shutterstock

Researchers at Duke University tested 14 different types of masks.

Masks such as N95, which are used by healthcare professionals, have been best at helping to stop the transmission of respiratory droplets during normal speech.

Three-layer surgical masks and cotton masks, which can be made at home, were other good remedies for preventing leakage. And while bandanas and knitted headbands may look unusual, they didn't provide much protection, according to a study.

The scientists also found that the neckbands that runners often wear were the least effective and actually allowed more respiratory droplets to escape than without a mask at all.

This is because they break down large droplets into smaller particles, which makes it easier for them to seep through the mask.

On the subject: Homemade face masks: how and from which fabric it is better to make them

“We were very surprised to find that the number of particles in such a mask actually exceeds the number of particles without any mask,” said Martin Fischer, one of the authors of the study. "We want to emphasize that we really encourage people to wear masks, but we want them to wear masks that really work."

To test the masks, the scientists used a black box equipped with a laser and a cell phone camera.

Someone wearing a mask spoke in the direction of a laser beam inside the box. Then, the number of respiratory drops scattered by the beam was recorded by a camera at the back of the box.

A computer algorithm counted the drops seen in the video to determine how many of them leaked through the mask.

The researchers said it is an inexpensive and effective method of testing which face masks work and which don't.

“This is a very powerful visual tool to raise awareness that very basic masks like homemade cotton masks do help stop most of these respiratory droplets,” Fischer said. "Companies and manufacturers can create the same setup and test their masks before manufacturing them, which would also be very helpful."

Read also on ForumDaily:

The collapse of confidence: why Americans are afraid of the COVID-19 vaccine

New fears: 5 things we fear in 2020 and how to live with them

Masks or screens for the face: which protects against coronavirus more effectively

Stays in the air for a long time: hundreds of scientists believe that WHO underestimates the infectivity of coronavirus

Coronavirus protection after quarantine: 3 items, without which you can not leave the house

Protection against coronavirus, dust and allergens: how effective are masks of different types

Miscellaneous research Educational program face masks
Subscribe to ForumDaily on Google News

Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? Subscribe to our page in Facebook. Choose the "Display Priority" option and read us first. Also, don't forget to subscribe to our РєР ° РЅР ° Р »РІ Telegram - there are many interesting things. And join thousands of readers ForumDaily Woman и ForumDaily New York - there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information. 

1099 requests in 3,578 seconds.