Collapse of confidence: why Americans are afraid of the COVID-19 vaccine - ForumDaily
The article has been automatically translated into English by Google Translate from Russian and has not been edited.
Переклад цього матеріалу українською мовою з російської було автоматично здійснено сервісом Google Translate, без подальшого редагування тексту.
Bu məqalə Google Translate servisi vasitəsi ilə avtomatik olaraq rus dilindən azərbaycan dilinə tərcümə olunmuşdur. Bundan sonra mətn redaktə edilməmişdir.

The collapse of confidence: why Americans are afraid of the COVID-19 vaccine

Six months into the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, cases are rising, small businesses are in decline, playgrounds are empty and unemployment is at 11%. The best hope to end this nightmare is a vaccine, and there are more than 165 of them in development. Reason.

Photo: Shutterstock

But when the vaccine becomes available, how many Americans will refuse it?

Vaccines are the greatest health advance of our time, preventing an estimated 4,5 billion infections since their introduction. So what explains the reluctance of so many Americans to get vaccinated?

It is a combination of a long history of how the government has misled the public, and the collapse of trust in public health authorities due to their catastrophic failures.

But if the government responds by trying to get Americans to get vaccinated against COVID-19, it will only help conspiracy theorists.

While most Americans surveyed say they are likely to get vaccinated, there is a real chance that a significant number of people who refuse could allow this new coronavirus to continue to spread.

“When you have groups of people with low vaccination rates, it only takes one sick person to spread the disease through the population,” Smith says.

Vaccine skeptics often focus on the claim that childhood vaccines cause autism.

This claim is known to have been reinforced by a British researcher named Andrew Wakefield, whose 1998 paper on the vaccine-autism link was later withdrawn. The UK General Medical Council found Wakefield guilty of ethics violation.

On the subject: In the United States created a vaccine against COVID-19 based on the avian plague virus

“There are people who really don't know what to think,” Smith says. “And they're really just trying to figure out what's going on?” Maybe they haven’t formed their opinion about vaccination yet.”

But US public health authorities have sometimes misled the public about vaccines and other public health measures, making it difficult to convince skeptics.

The Tuskegee experiment sparked deep distrust of government and public health, especially in black American communities.

In 1932, government doctors hired mostly poor blacks to study the effects of syphilis. Participants, most of whom had the disease, were told they were receiving an experimental drug when in fact all of them were given a placebo. The scientists who conducted the study were actually interested in the development of the disease if left untreated.

The experiment continued until penicillin became available in 1947, and many of the participants died.

Another incident that undermined confidence in public health occurred in 1976 when a new virus called swine flu broke out at a US military base. Scientists believed it bore a genetic similarity to the 1918 flu, which killed more than 100 million people worldwide. President Gerald Ford allocated $ 135 million to develop and introduce the vaccine, and the government administered the vaccine to 25 percent of Americans over a 10-month period. But a global pandemic never came. The disease has died out. And the emergency version of the vaccine probably led to some consequences, although probably not as big as the media reported at the time.

One of the reasons public health officials may face significant opposition to a nationwide vaccination program is how they handle COVID-19.

Changing their stance on face masks, authorities said their previous report was motivated by a desire to preserve protective gear for medical workers, without even admitting that they were wrong in saying masks would not slow the spread of the virus.

Public health authorities have also issued conflicting reports about the safety of large gatherings following the Black Lives Matters protests.

On the subject: Fighting COVID-19: How a Laboratory Works to Accelerate Vaccine Development for Years

The World Health Organization (WHO) failed to properly investigate the initial outbreak in China, which may have made the world less prepared than it should have been for the emerging pandemic; The Trump administration has repeatedly downplayed the threat of the virus, and the CDC flunked early testing rollouts.

If there is any hope of restoring public confidence in a vaccination program that, unlike the 1973 swine flu vaccine, will be subjected to extensive safety testing, public health authorities must acknowledge their past mistakes.

“Right now, in the United States, people should not be wearing masks,” said National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci. “Wearing a mask may make people feel a little better, but they don’t provide perfect protection.” And there are often unintended consequences: people frequently adjust their mask and touch their face.”

The CDC amended its mask guidelines on April 3, 2020 to recommend wearing surgical or cloth masks in public, and businesses and local governments began demanding masks. When asked in front of Congress on June 30, 2020 if he regretted his earlier statements about masks, Fauci did not acknowledge that he and other public health officials called masks ineffective and instead focused solely on a shortage of health workers.

“I don’t regret not advising the use of masks, because let me explain to you what happened: At the time public health officials were not advising us to wear masks, our health care providers were short of equipment,” Fauci said.

On the subject: In Russia announced the readiness of the vaccine against coronavirus: the United States and Europe are wary

If the recommendation for wearing face masks was a so-called “noble lie” to conserve supplies for medical workers, public health officials should acknowledge this rationale, acknowledge that their understanding of the transmission of the virus was insufficient.

And if a vaccine becomes available, doctors must acknowledge that vaccines may carry a certain risk, especially a new vaccine that is being released to the market at a record speed, but they must also explain that this risk is often worth taking because there are no perfect solutions, only compromises.

The lesson of the past six months is that authoritarian mandates and noble lies tend to backfire.

Read also on ForumDaily:

Why is immunity to coronavirus found in people who have not had COVID-19

In Russia announced the readiness of the vaccine against coronavirus: the United States and Europe are wary

Prices of COVID-19 vaccine from different companies announced

In the United States created a vaccine against COVID-19 based on the avian plague virus

The faint-hearted not to watch: 10 films and series about viruses and epidemics

Miscellanea vaccine Educational program coronavirus Special Projects
Subscribe to ForumDaily on Google News

Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? — support us donate! Also subscribe to our page Facebook. Select the “Priority in display” option and read us first. Also, don't forget to subscribe to our РєР ° РЅР ° Р »РІ Telegram  and Instagram- there is a lot of interesting things there. And join thousands of readers ForumDaily New York — there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information about life in the metropolis. 



 
1091 requests in 2,006 seconds.