This crime is committed by all residents of California, however, according to the law, they can still be punished for it - ForumDaily
The article has been automatically translated into English by Google Translate from Russian and has not been edited.
Переклад цього матеріалу українською мовою з російської було автоматично здійснено сервісом Google Translate, без подальшого редагування тексту.
Bu məqalə Google Translate servisi vasitəsi ilə avtomatik olaraq rus dilindən azərbaycan dilinə tərcümə olunmuşdur. Bundan sonra mətn redaktə edilməmişdir.

This crime is committed by all California residents, but the law can still punish for it.

Among the city dwellers of many large metropolitan areas, be it the District of Columbia, San Francisco or New York, there is an unspoken rule: if you are standing at an intersection with a traffic light, but the cars are not approaching, then you can cross the street even if its red signal. But you cannot cross in the wrong place - for this you face a large fine. How they tried to change this in California, the publication said. San francisco gate.

Photo: Shutterstock

This isn't standard practice everywhere, and it's probably not a good idea at, say, a highway exit intersection or a widened dual carriageway. But in many cases, crossing the street is a relatively harmless act if done correctly—and whether you want to admit it or not, chances are you've done the same thing.

So this begs the question: why did California Governor Gavin Newsom veto a bill decriminalizing a transition in the wrong place? In his veto, he expressed concern that California still has a high pedestrian death rate. The state is ranked eighth in the United States.

“I am concerned that the bill will inadvertently reduce pedestrian safety and potentially increase the number of deaths or serious injuries caused by pedestrians who enter roadways in inappropriate locations,” Newsom wrote in his veto statement.

But Assemblyman Phil Ting and many other proponents of the bill believe the decision to veto was wrong, as the law does not completely criminalize transitions in the wrong place.

Ting, representing California's 19th District, including parts of San Francisco, explained that his main goal in writing the bill was to encourage more voters to explore their cities on foot. In part, he was inspired by the fact that the walking tour originally began as an advertising campaign for a car manufacturer.

“What we wanted to do was make sure that enforcement was fair and also ensure that we could continue to encourage more and more people to go to work, to go to school, to go about their daily lives without fear of fines,” Ting said.

On the subject: US Hate Crimes Peak in 12 Years

Ting pointed out that jaywalking fines are too high relative to the proportion of the crime and disproportionately affect poor and working-class residents - typically $250.

The bill would ban fines for crossing "without direct danger" and would allow pedestrians to "cross the pedestrian crossing at the yellow light." The bill would continue to prohibit risky crossings, such as on crowded thoroughfares or highways.

He was supported by cyclist and pedestrian groups in the state and city of Berkeley, many of whom argued that the law would level the playing field for pedestrians in a heavily car-driven state.

“The concept of crosswalks is fundamentally flawed and devalues ​​people walking,” says Jodi Medeiros.

But the bill met with strong opposition from law enforcement groups, most notably the California Sheriff's Association. The association said the bill "will cause confusion and relieve drivers and pedestrians from expectations regarding the safe use of the roadway."

Ting disputed that claim, noting that most Californians who cross the road don't think they're doing anything illegal. “Up until this very second, we probably have hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Californians jaywalking right now,” he said. “I don’t think it creates chaos or confusion.”

Other experts, such as Richard Retting of the Governor's Highway Traffic Safety Association, attribute the rise in pedestrian deaths not to pedestrians themselves, but to poor, inattentive drivers and larger vehicles such as SUVs that are becoming more popular.

And for legal advocates, the move to decriminalize the wrong place transition in California would continue to cut unnecessary police intervention, which Ting said disproportionately affects the poor and the working class, as well as non-white people, especially black Californians.

In 2018, Chinedu Okobi, a 36-year-old black man, was sentenced to death after one of the officers stopped him for going in the wrong place. Elsewhere in California, Kurt Reinhold, a 42-year-old homeless black man, was fatally wounded by two police officers designated as “homeless liaison” after they stopped Reinhold for crossing a street in the wrong place.

The data showed that black Californians in major cities, including Sacramento and Los Angeles, were four to five times more likely to be stopped by the police for crossing in the wrong place than whites.

You may be interested in: top New York news, stories of our immigrants and helpful tips about life in the Big Apple - read it all on ForumDaily New York

Progressive legal and political organizations such as the San Francisco Civil Rights Lawyers' Committee (co-sponsor of the bill) and the Sunrise Movement in Los Angeles have argued that street safety can be achieved without punishing pedestrians.

“We can have safe streets without criminal penalties,” says Rio Scharf of the Bay Area Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights.

In other states, the laws on crossing the road have been changed. This year, Virginia passed a similar law decriminalizing mis-signaling, reducing it to a secondary offense. Nevada did the same.

For Ting, the failure to pass this bill means that with the rise in popularity of safe streets and other measures to keep people walking in their cities, California is left behind.

“We're trying to get more people on bikes, more people on public transport, our laws and our bureaucracy need to catch up, and they haven't,” Ting concluded.

Read also on ForumDaily:

Sixteen Best US Cities for Fall Vacation

Top 25 places to visit in Los Angeles

States of the USA, where Russians are best treated: impressions of an immigrant

Unusual lakes in the 'Russian desert' in California: how to get there and what to see

Miscellanea In the U.S. California violation
Subscribe to ForumDaily on Google News

Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? — support us donate! Also subscribe to our page Facebook. Select the “Priority in display” option and read us first. Also, don't forget to subscribe to our РєР ° РЅР ° Р »РІ Telegram  and Instagram- there is a lot of interesting things there. And join thousands of readers ForumDaily New York — there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information about life in the metropolis. 



 
1085 requests in 1,238 seconds.