The article has been automatically translated into English by Google Translate from Russian and has not been edited.
Переклад цього матеріалу українською мовою з російської було автоматично здійснено сервісом Google Translate, без подальшого редагування тексту.
Bu məqalə Google Translate servisi vasitəsi ilə avtomatik olaraq rus dilindən azərbaycan dilinə tərcümə olunmuşdur. Bundan sonra mətn redaktə edilməmişdir.

The Future of the Presidential Election: US Supreme Court Decides Fate of Voting Process

The US Supreme Court will decide whether or not 538 members of the Electoral College should vote for the winners in their states. Writes about it USA Today.

Фото: Depositphotos

The Washington State Supreme Court ruled to impose fines of $ 1000 on three electors who voted in December 2016 for Colin Powell, and not Hillary Clinton, who won the state.

Never before have the uncertain tendencies of some members of the Electoral College decided the election results, so the influence of a higher court decision can be just mathematical. But the 2020 race between President Donald Trump and his possible Democratic opponent can be risky for such a decision.

“The court must resolve this conflict now before it arises in the context of the election,” said Lawrence Lessig, a professor at Harvard Law School, on behalf of three Washington voters. He noted that in 2016 10 voters either went against the system or tried to do it, which is enough to change the results of the presidential election.

"Since the demographics of the United States show that the number of votes for each candidate will be approximately the same, there is a high probability that such fluctuations may force the court to decide the issue of freedom of election," Lessig warned.

On the subject: Unexpectedly: impeachment can help Trump win the 2020 presidential election of the year

In accordance with the Constitution, each state appoints electors to vote, distributed by popular vote. Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia require electors to vote for their party's candidate.

The Washington State Supreme Court ruled that the state has the power to impose the first fines in history for the so-called wrong electors.

“The elector acts according to state laws, and the right of the First Amendment is not violated when the state imposes a fine for violation by the elector of the law,” the court ruled.

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals set a different precedent in the case. “States cannot stop electors from acting at their own discretion when voting for the president and vice president,” the court ruled.

The split between the two courts, as well as the real prospect that electors can decide who wins the election, probably prompted the judges to take action.

Even a Colorado voter, whose vote for Kasich was upheld, agreed that the Supreme Court should intervene. Only Washington State urged judges not to intervene.

To give the electors such independence, Noah Purcell, Solicitor General, wrote to the judges, “That would mean that only 538 Americans — members of the Electoral College — have the right to vote, and can decide who should be the president of the United States.”

Miscellaneous In the U.S. US Supreme Court U.S. election

Read also on ForumDaily:

Recipes for extending power: how presidents changed the Constitution in the countries of the former USSR

Super women and console wars: what awaits us in 2020

Faces of 2019: Zelensky, Trump and Putin hit the provocative cover of The Week

Trump became the third president in US history to be impeached: what's next

We ask you for support: make your contribution to the development of the ForumDaily project

Thank you for staying with us and trusting! Over the past four years, we have received a lot of grateful feedback from readers who helped our materials arrange life after moving to the USA, get a job or education, find a place to live or arrange a child in a kindergarten.

Now we want to ask YOU for support.

High-quality journalism requires serious financial investments and our revenues do not always cover the costs of maintaining the editorial staff, which jeopardizes the continuous operation of the site. We do not introduce a paid subscription, so that Russian-speaking immigrants in the United States can freely receive verified information in their native language. But we will be grateful to you for any amount that you are willing to share so that we can continuously provide useful information to thousands of immigrants.

Security of contributions is guaranteed by the use of the highly secure Stripe system.

Always yours, ForumDaily!

Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? Subscribe to our page in Facebook. Choose the option "Priority in the show" - and read us first. And don't forget to subscribe to ForumDaily Woman and ForumDaily New York - there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information.

1026 requests in 2,101 seconds.