One state overturns governor’s self-isolation order in court

The Wisconsin Supreme Court overturned Governor Tony Evers's self-isolation regime to prevent the spread of coronavirus. This was the first time that a court of last resort rejected a ruling of this kind throughout the state, writes USA Today.

Photo: Shutterstock

On May 13, a conservative-controlled court sided with Republican lawmakers in a decision restricting the authority of the Evers administration to act unilaterally during public health emergencies.

The court ruling immediately cancels all restrictions on enterprises and meetings imposed by an order of the administration, but retains a ban on closing schools until the fall. This happened after Evers had already begun to remove some restrictions, because the spread of the virus slowed down.

The Republicans who filed the lawsuit asked the judges to side with them, but the order remained valid for about a week, giving Evers and lawmakers the opportunity to develop a new pandemic plan. The judges refused to do so, and their decision took effect immediately.

To set any new restrictions, the Democratic governor and the Republican-controlled Legislature will be forced to work together to deal with the rise and fall of coronavirus cases, something the two sides have rarely been able to achieve before.

In the absence of policies to contain COVID-19, bars, restaurants and concert halls could reopen — unless local officials impose their own restrictions. This increases the likelihood that the policy will be changed.

Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald of Juneau said Evers was the one who “created the space for chaos,” lifting restrictions on the retail business in the second week of May, instead of step-by-step implementing the opening plan, which requires certain criteria.

On the subject: With the support of Trump and Elon Musk: who organizes protests against quarantine in the United States

Less than an hour after the decision was released, the Wisconsin Tavern League told its members they could welcome customers back into their bars and urged them to embrace safety guidelines.

While most of the state can open their businesses and enterprises, the judiciary has no plans to do so. Jurisdictional trials and personal trials are suspended due to dangers associated with COVID-19.

GOP lawmakers who filed the lawsuit said a legal issue was needed to take a place among those who, along with Evers and health officials, made decisions about the response to the outbreak of coronavirus, which killed 418 people in two months.

The ruling was issued the day after the survey showed that the public trusts Evers more than the legislature on when to start discovering and mitigating the limitations of the outbreak.

State Senator Dan Feyen said officials will soon work out a plan to open the state, and in the meantime, citizens must show "good old common sense and personal responsibility." But Fitzgerald said he wanted to focus on large-scale testing and contact tracing in order to get a good idea of ​​where the virus spreads, but did not mention the introduction of new restrictions.

Evers spokeswoman Melissa Baldauff said on Twitter that Fitzgerald's desire to focus on testing without imposing restrictions "sounds terrible."

Not all judges treated the decision equally.

“This decision will undoubtedly rank as one of the most egregious examples of judicial activism in the history of this court. And Wisconsinites will pay a heavy price for it,” Judge Rebecca Dallet wrote.

Most judges concluded that Evers has broader powers during emergencies, but there are limits to these powers.

“If there is a forest fire, there will be no time for debate. We need to act. The governor can declare an emergency and respond accordingly. But in a pandemic that drags on month after month, the Governor cannot rely on emergency powers indefinitely,” Chief Justice Patience Roggensack wrote.

Michael Meistelman, a lawyer who occasionally represented Evers, said the judges “made this decision in order to create their own laws to achieve their political goals.”

“This action will inevitably lead to increased morbidity and mortality,” he said. “The judges will have blood on their hands, and the people of Wisconsin will not forget this.”

On the subject: Los Angeles quarantine extended for summer: what do California residents prepare for

Wisconsin was one of 43 states where the governor issued a self-isolation regime. The decision to lift restrictions was also made after public support for the bans weakened. Several thousand people protested against quarantine at rallies across the state in recent weeks, some compared Evers to a dictator, while others complained that the regime had nearly destroyed their livelihoods.

More than 500 people in the state filed for unemployment benefits after Evers ordered the closure of “nonessential” businesses like bars, hair salons and tattoo parlors.

But the self-isolation regime still has widespread public support. A survey published on May 12 by Marquette University Law School showed that 69% of those surveyed consider Evers's actions appropriate, although in March more than 80% supported him.

Evers and his lawyer said the lawsuit will reduce the effectiveness of life-saving measures and increase the threat to the health and lives of state residents.

Read also on ForumDaily:

Medical insurance during the crisis: what to do to those who have lost their jobs and got sick COVID-19

Astronauts, hermits and sailors - how to survive self-isolation

13 films that predict the future of coronavirus and more

Taxpayers sue governor of California over idea of ​​paying benefits to illegal immigrants

Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? — support us donate! Also subscribe to our page Facebook. Select the “Priority in display” option and read us first. Also, don't forget to subscribe to our РєР ° РЅР ° Р »РІ Telegram  and Instagram- there is a lot of interesting things there. And join thousands of readers ForumDaily New York — there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information about life in the metropolis.