The article has been automatically translated into English by Google Translate from Russian and has not been edited.
Переклад цього матеріалу українською мовою з російської було автоматично здійснено сервісом Google Translate, без подальшого редагування тексту.
Bu məqalə Google Translate servisi vasitəsi ilə avtomatik olaraq rus dilindən azərbaycan dilinə tərcümə olunmuşdur. Bundan sonra mətn redaktə edilməmişdir.

California earthquake increases five times the risk of tremors

The earthquakes that struck Ridgecrest (California) in 2019 could create a domino effect and cause tremors across the San Andreas Fault, which in turn increased the likelihood of a major earthquake in 2021. Writes about it National Geographic.

Photo: Shutterstock

Southern California has a huge Z-shaped rift.The top is made up of a convoluted series of rifts that caused the 2019 earthquakes that hit Ridgecrest. The diagonal section is an ancient rift called Garlock that runs westward. and the lower part of Z is the mighty San Andreas.

Earthquakes along this long fault, which extends over 800 miles (1 km) through California, are an ongoing problem, and a new study suggests that a strong earthquake in the Los Angeles area could occur 287-2021 times in 3 more likely than previously thought.

A study published in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America showed that the Ridgecrest earthquakes in 2019 created all the conditions for a likely future major earthquake along the Garlock Fault. If a strong enough earthquake hits Garlock, it can also cause an earthquake in San Andreas. Such a series of events, according to researchers, has a probability of 1 in 87 next year.

However, the overall likelihood of such an event remains low. The research team estimates that there will be a 7,7 percent chance of a 2,3 earthquake hitting Garlock next year, and a 1,15 percent chance of a similar earthquake hitting San Andreas.

“In our opinion, the likelihood of a massive earthquake in 2021 is significantly higher due to the Ridgecrest earthquake,” said study co-author Ross Stein, CEO of Temblor, Inc., a company that assesses the risks associated with hazards such as earthquakes. ...

On the subject: The probability of a powerful earthquake in San Francisco exceeded all expectations

Assessing the likelihood of earthquakes is difficult. Scientists are increasingly realizing that the deep faults that generate them are complex networks of cracks and chasms. “They are fractals. They are rough. They have bends and breaks, ”Stein says.

Faults can also interact: movement one by one can increase the load on the other, causing a series of earthquakes "like a domino effect," says Alessandro Verdecchia, a geologist at McGill University. The new model is the latest attempt to assess the likelihood of this potentially fatal scenario.

The domino effect

The San Andreas Fault marks the boundary where the North American tectonic plate and the Pacific plate cross each other. As the Pacific Plate slowly moves along the northwestern route, stress builds up until the soil breaks, causing the surface to move.

There were a lot of earthquakes in California in the last century, but the last time a great one happened on San Andreas itself in 1906, when an earthquake of magnitude 7,9 stretched 300 miles (482 km) from the fault, destroying buildings in San Francisco and killing more than 3000 people. It was the deadliest earthquake in US history.

A new study suggests that the Ridgecrest earthquakes increased the likelihood of another 5 times more likely, this time in southern California.

The 2019 earthquake was double, in one day there were two tremors with a magnitude of 6,4, and then 7,1. The movement from these earthquakes distorted the surrounding landscape, transferring stress to nearby faults such as Garlock.

To assess this change, Stein and co-author of the Shinji Toda study at Tohoku University in Japan created a model based on movement along faults during the Ridgecrest earthquake. According to Stein, they also included data on many earthquakes to visualize the fault.

According to model estimates, during the year after the Ridgecrest earthquake, there was an 8 percent chance of an earthquake of magnitude 7,7 along Garlock. Although this did not happen, researchers suggest that there is an even greater risk than previously recognized. Next year, the likelihood of such an earthquake will remain at 2,3 percent, which is about 100 times more than previous models.

An earthquake strong enough along the Garlock - a magnitude of 7,5 or more, according to the researchers - could trigger an earthquake along San Andreas, heading south towards Los Angeles.

On the subject: 10 strongest earthquake in California history

“The fact that the probability of an earthquake is higher is interesting and perhaps encourages us to look at the whole situation more closely,” says John Vidale, a geophysicist at the University of Southern California, who was not involved in the study, citing the estimated likelihood of a large earthquake. But many uncertainties still remain, he says, and the time period with the greatest risk for the Garlock earthquake has passed, so the new model "doesn't necessarily mean we should be more scared."

Regardless, the new job is a good reminder that everyone in the earthquake-prone state must be prepared, Stein says. If a massive earthquake hits Garlock, it could be weeks, months, or even longer before San Andreas "wakes up" too - if it ever does. But earthquakes in this region are inevitable at some point in the future.

The study does not take into account many factors

“All models, including the latest, make assumptions about our amazingly complex planet. For example, the new model does not account for the complexities of fluid interactions that can change fault stresses over long periods of time, ”says Pablo Gonzalez, a geophysicist at the University of Liverpool in England.

The model also assumes that the base is uniform in composition. But moving along the Garlock Fault over the course of millions of years displaced the earth by about 40 miles (64 km), which means that the rock in the north is different from the rock in the south, says Gonzalez.

According to Chris Goldfinger, an earthquake geologist at the University of Oregon, one of the specific problems with all earthquake predictions is that researchers do not know how many additional shocks are required to cause an earthquake.

Miscellaneous earthquake California

Read also on ForumDaily:

12 phenomena on our planet that even scientists cannot believe

Unknown San Francisco: 15 facts about a cult city that many don't know

Earthquakes and volcanic eruptions: the sun has reduced activity at a record - the Earth is threatened with cataclysms

10 strongest earthquake in California history

Let's face the crisis together and support each other

Thank you for staying with us and trusting! Over the past 5 years, we have received a lot of grateful feedback from readers, whom our materials have helped to arrange life after moving to the USA. We have big plans, we don't want to stop or slow down the pace of work. Even now…

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected our income, and in order to stay afloat, we have to ask YOU for support. We will be grateful for any amount and will make every effort to continue to publish news and a lot of useful information just as quickly.

Thank you for being with us!

Always yours, ForumDaily! WomanForumDaily, NewYork, ForumDaily!

Security of contributions is guaranteed by the use of the highly secure Stripe system.

Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? Subscribe to our page in Facebook. Choose the "Display Priority" option and read us first. And don't forget to subscribe to ForumDaily Woman and ForumDaily New York - there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information.



1053 requests in 3,428 seconds.