Division of property between Plaksin and Uspenskaya: the singer lost the court
Exclusive! ForumDaily is the first to publish the point of view of the side of Alexander Plaksin in this process - before no media was able to receive comment his lawyer Karina Duval.
On May 12, 2021, the Krasnogorsk City Court of the Moscow Region satisfied the claims of Alexander Plaksin against his wife, Lyuba Uspenskaya, on the division of property. Satisfied fully and recognized his right to 1/2 share of all property known to us located on the territory of the Russian Federation.
We - me and my client Alexander Plaksin - did not cover this case in the press, the defendant Lyuba Uspenskaya and her lawyer did it themselves, removing the secrecy label from this case and forcing us to talk about what usually only judicial archives know.
For the past two weeks, TV and the Russian Internet space have been replete with headlines about this process. The information, however, was presented one-sidedly: we were not invited to the programs and no one checked the accuracy of the information provided by Lyubina. And on May 12, 2021, the court put an end to this case.
Let's see how it all began in the marriage of Plaksin and Uspenskaya and how it ended. In 1987, Alexander Plaksin and Lyuba Uspenskaya got married. They registered their marriage in Las Vegas (Nevada). For some time, there was an opinion on the network that, they say, the marriage concluded in Las Vegas was not real and, therefore, did not give rise to legally significant consequences.
But no, Russian legislation gives an unequivocal answer to this question. In accordance with Art. 158 (part 2) of the Family Code of the Russian Federation, marriages between foreign citizens concluded outside the territory of the Russian Federation in compliance with the legislation of the state on whose territory they are concluded are recognized as valid in the Russian Federation. This means that as long as marriages in Las Vegas are recognized in the United States, they will be recognized in Russia as well. Consequently, the marriage of Plaksin and Uspenskaya is valid.
Further, Articles 33-34 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation establish that the legal regime of spouses' property is the regime of joint ownership. The legal regime of the spouses' property is valid, unless otherwise provided by the marriage contract. By a marriage contract, the spouses have the right to change the legal regime of joint ownership by choosing the regime of joint, shared or separate ownership of all property, its separate types or the property of each of the spouses. However, the marriage contract between Plaksin and Uspenskaya was not concluded either in Russia or in the United States.
They did not live in a dilapidated dugout, but for exactly thirty years and three years. In 2020, Alexander Plaksin asked me to divide the property acquired by the spouses in Russia.
Despite our desire to end the matter peacefully, representatives of Lyuba Uspenskaya were not ready for a constructive dialogue. On the freeze frame from the program “Male / Female” dated April 30, 2021, you can clearly read the regulations proposed by Lyuba's lawyers (the program editors did not even bother to remove my name from the freeze frame).
1. Provision, including the necessary expenses for treatment, for the common (31-year-old) child of Tatiana Plaksina.
It's no secret that a child, in accordance with the legislation of both Russia and the United States, is a person under 18 years of age.
2. Prospects for the official dissolution of marriage between Plaksin A. and Uspenskaya L.
The marriage between the spouses exists to this day, and none of the spouses has raised the issue of divorce. Why should lawyers discuss an issue that their clients are not interested in solving?
3. Official registration of ownership of all property acquired formally according to the time criterion during the marriage between Plaksin A. and Uspenskaya L.
By “all property” is meant an apartment that is located in Los Angeles and is not in dispute.
The defendant's lawyers refused to discuss the issues stated in our statement of claim, and we received a counterclaim with offensive statements that Plaksin had not worked all his life, led a parasitic lifestyle, spent money to the detriment of his family's interests and, finally, did not live with Anyone. one family for over 10 years. In support of their arguments, they brought witnesses to the court, who, however, confirmed the opposite.
We were able to collect evidence in the United States: joint tax returns of spouses, joint bank accounts, employment records, health and life insurance. Life insurance, in particular, was issued back in 2003 for a period until 2046, that is, for life. The appointment of his wife as the main beneficiary and the amount of insurance compensation in the amount of 250 thousand dollars unmistakably indicate not only Plaksin's actions in the interests of the family, which is obvious, but also speak of his concern for the defendant even in the event of his death.
The documents we collected shook the confidence of Lyuba's lawyers in the invulnerability of their position, and therefore, first of all, they challenged the judge, indicating the following points in their statement:
1. The statement of Ouspenskaya Lyuba that this trial is a prolonged traumatic situation for her was not taken into account by the court, the case was postponed for a month and a half, as Plaksin's representatives wished.
2. The court shows excessive favor to the side of the plaintiff, disregarding the interests of the defendant.
3. The court demonstrates particular confidence in the information provided by the plaintiff.
The claim to challenge the defendant's lawyers was denied, and there were no other arguments left. The case is over. Alexander Plaksin's claim was fully satisfied. Lyuba herself refused the counterclaim.
Read also on ForumDaily:
stdClass Object ([term_id] => 407 [name] => court [taxonomy] => post_tag [slug] => sud)court
stdClass Object ([term_id] => 16228 [name] => Columns [taxonomy] => category [slug] => bloggers)loudspeakers
stdClass Object ([term_id] => 28936 [name] => Lyubov Uspenskaya [taxonomy] => post_tag [slug] => lyubov-uspenskaya)Love Uspenskaya
stdClass Object ([term_id] => 28937 [name] => Alexander Plaksin [taxonomy] => post_tag [slug] => aleksandr-plaksin)Alexander Plaksin
stdClass Object ([term_id] => 28938 [name] => property section [taxonomy] => post_tag [slug] => razdel-imushhestva)property division
Let's face the crisis together and support each other
Thank you for staying with us and trusting! Over the past 5 years, we have received a lot of grateful feedback from readers, whom our materials have helped to arrange life after moving to the United States. We have big plans, we do not want to stop or slow down the pace of work. Even now…
The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected our income, and in order to stay afloat, we have to ask YOU for support. We will be grateful for any amount and will make every effort to continue to publish news and a lot of useful information just as quickly.
Thank you for being with us!
Always yours, ForumDaily!
Security of contributions is guaranteed by the use of the highly secure Stripe system.
Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? Subscribe to our page in Facebook. Choose the "Display Priority" option and read us first. Also, don't forget to subscribe to our РєР ° РЅР ° Р »РІ Telegram - there are many interesting things. And join thousands of readers ForumDaily Woman и ForumDaily New York - there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information.