The article has been automatically translated into English by Google Translate from Russian and has not been edited.
Переклад цього матеріалу українською мовою з російської було автоматично здійснено сервісом Google Translate, без подальшого редагування тексту.
Bu məqalə Google Translate servisi vasitəsi ilə avtomatik olaraq rus dilindən azərbaycan dilinə tərcümə olunmuşdur. Bundan sonra mətn redaktə edilməmişdir.

'I didn't think I would live': a US court ruled Snowden's right

The Court of Appeal, among other things, admitted that surveillance could be unconstitutional. "Voice of America".

Photo: video frame YouTube / VICE

Seven years after former US National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden disclosed information about the large-scale tracking of American telephone conversations, the appellate court ruled that the surveillance program was illegal.

The court also found that the US intelligence officials who publicly defended the program were not telling the truth.

In its ruling, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said the system, which secretly collected data on telephone conversations of millions of Americans without proper warrants, violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and may have been unconstitutional.

The influential American Civil Liberties Union called the court's ruling "a victory for our privacy."

On the subject: US authorities sue Snowden over publication of memoirs

Commentators also point out that the court's decision confirms the ineffectiveness of tracking telephone conversations as a tool for preventing terrorist attacks.

Snowden, who fled to Russia after revelations in 2013 and charged with espionage in the United States, tweeted that the court ruling upheld his decision to release evidence of domestic NSA surveillance.

"I could not imagine that I would live to see the moment when our courts recognize the actions of the NSA as illegal, and in the same ruling will give me credit for disclosing information about them," Snowden said.

Photo: screenshot

Details of the judgment

The court found that the collection of telephone data was not necessary to arrest terror suspects in a case cited by the US government in defense of the need for a surveillance program. ArsTechnica.

The ruling in the US Court of Appeals referred to a 2013 case in which four Somalis were accused of “conspiring to send $ 10 to Somalia to support a foreign terrorist organization”. But the data illegally collected by wiretapping was not significant enough to sway the evidence the government legally collected. It got what it needed from the wiretapping of the phone of the defendant Basaali Said Moalin, and not from the mass wiretapping of the Americans, the newspaper writes.

A three-judge panel of judges unanimously “ruled that the collection of data exceeded the amount allowed by Congress and violated the section of the Covert Surveillance for Foreign Intelligence Act,” the ruling said.

The judges also wrote that "the government could have violated the Fourth Amendment when it collected telephone data from millions of Americans, including at least one of the defendants." But the judges did not decide on a possible violation of the Fourth Amendment, because the case was not considered in this vein.

On the subject: Senate report: Trump aide collaborated with Russian intelligence in 2016 elections

The massive data collection that "captured complete call records of every customer of America's largest telephone companies," mandated by the US Patriot Act of 2001, was banned in 2015 under the Freedom Act. The program has been replaced by a more targeted collection of phone company records, which was reportedly stopped in 2018.

In addition to being illegal and ineffective, the NSA's espionage program violated the privacy of millions of Americans.

“The NSA has been collecting telephone metadata from millions of Americans on an ongoing, daily basis for years,” the judges wrote. This long-term surveillance, made possible by new technologies, is "reversing conventional expectations of privacy."

In 2013, the NSA told Congress that the case demonstrated the value of a massive collection of telephone records. But in 2016, US government officials said that the telephone data of Moalin's main wiretapping target "was not and was not necessary to confirm the necessary probable cause specified in the Covert Surveillance Act for Foreign Intelligence."

Read also on ForumDaily:

'The result of drinking problems and depression': an American officer wanted to transfer US military secrets to Russia

10 people who have been stuck in airports for years or still live there

Russian hackers leaked data of millions of American voters to the darknet

Two fans of Russia were arrested in the USA this week: their stories are amazing

Miscellaneous In the U.S. Edward Snowden US intelligence
Subscribe to ForumDaily on Google News

Let's face the crisis together and support each other

Thank you for staying with us and trusting! Over the past 5 years, we have received a lot of grateful feedback from readers, whom our materials have helped to arrange life after moving to the United States. We have big plans, we do not want to stop or slow down the pace of work. Even now…

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected our income, and in order to stay afloat, we have to ask YOU for support. We will be grateful for any amount and will make every effort to continue to publish news and a lot of useful information just as quickly.

Thank you for being with us!

Always yours, ForumDaily!

Security of contributions is guaranteed by the use of the highly secure Stripe system.

Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? Subscribe to our page in Facebook. Choose the "Display Priority" option and read us first. Also, don't forget to subscribe to our РєР ° РЅР ° Р »РІ Telegram - there are many interesting things. And join thousands of readers ForumDaily Woman и ForumDaily New York - there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information. 

1084 requests in 2,381 seconds.