Federal court blocks an increase in the cost of immigration services - ForumDaily
The article has been automatically translated into English by Google Translate from Russian and has not been edited.
Переклад цього матеріалу українською мовою з російської було автоматично здійснено сервісом Google Translate, без подальшого редагування тексту.
Bu məqalə Google Translate servisi vasitəsi ilə avtomatik olaraq rus dilindən azərbaycan dilinə tərcümə olunmuşdur. Bundan sonra mətn redaktə edilməmişdir.

Federal court blocked the rise in the cost of immigration services

A federal judge in California temporarily blocked a rule from the administration of US President Donald Trump, which would increase naturalization fees by more than 80% and collected fees from asylum seekers. This happened just a few days before the decree was supposed to come into force. CNN.

Photo: Shutterstock

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the agency responsible for the country's immigration and naturalization system, has updated and finalized its fee structure after nearly nine months of work.

The agency would increase the cost of filing online naturalization applications from $ 640 to $ 1160, and also introduce a $ 50 fee for asylum seekers. Historically, asylum seekers around the world have not been charged an application fee, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the injunction is preliminary in nature, if the court decision is not appealed, then the increase in prices for services will be postponed until the investigation is completed and a final verdict is issued.

For a complete list of changes that were supposed to take effect, read our material.

The plaintiffs argue that if the rule goes into effect, it will “prevent vulnerable and low-income applicants from applying for immigration benefits, block access to humanitarian protections, and expose the public to further danger,” Judge Jeffrey White wrote in his ruling Tuesday, Sept. 29.

On the subject: USCIS has extended the deadline for responding to immigration requests: what you need to know

Plaintiffs also cite comments and studies that argue that the public at large would be harmed if the latter rule came into force as it would negatively impact tax revenues and detain individuals seeking naturalization from participating in critical civic activities such as voting. service in government agencies and admission to jury trials.

USCIS officials said higher filing fees are necessary for an agency that is on the brink of a crisis to continue working. BuzzFeedNews.

The reasons for the lack of funding in the department are being discussed: officials cite a sharp decline in immigration applications due to the pandemic, and immigrant advocates and experts argue that the restrictive policies of the administration of US President Donald Trump played a big role in this.

Decree was supposed to come into force on October 2.

Read also on ForumDaily:

Asylum seekers banned from bringing interpreters with them to interviews

USCIS has extended the deadline for responding to immigration requests: what you need to know

What services need to be notified about the change of address when moving

'Your status depends on the mail': how delays in the US Postal Service decide the fate of immigrants

One small change in legislation could legalize millions of illegal immigrants in the USA

Iris scan, voice print, DNA samples: US to expand personal data collection of immigrants

In the U.S. court USCIS
Subscribe to ForumDaily on Google News

Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? — support us donate! Also subscribe to our page Facebook. Select the “Priority in display” option and read us first. Also, don't forget to subscribe to our РєР ° РЅР ° Р »РІ Telegram  and Instagram- there is a lot of interesting things there. And join thousands of readers ForumDaily New York — there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information about life in the metropolis. 



 
1064 requests in 1,173 seconds.