The article has been automatically translated into English by Google Translate from Russian and has not been edited.
Переклад цього матеріалу українською мовою з російської було автоматично здійснено сервісом Google Translate, без подальшого редагування тексту.
Bu məqalə Google Translate servisi vasitəsi ilə avtomatik olaraq rus dilindən azərbaycan dilinə tərcümə olunmuşdur. Bundan sonra mətn redaktə edilməmişdir.

Apple wins $ 15 billion tax court from EU

Apple won the first tax bout with the European Union for 13 billion euros ($ 14,9 billion): the American iPhone maker succeeded in court overturning the EU decision on a giant surcharge to the budget of Ireland. Writes about it with the BBC.

Photo: Shutterstock

Having sided with Apple and Ireland, the European Court has erected a serious barrier to the EU’s “crusade” against American giants like Google, Facebook and Amazon, who earn money all over the world, and pay taxes in the United States or in preferential jurisdictions. And he showed how difficult it will be to equalize tax conditions within the single market of 27 EU countries, which the EU authorities have been achieving for almost a decade.

The price of the issue is gigantic: EU countries lose more than 250 billion euros ($ 286 billion) per year due to ingenious tax schemes - legal and not very. And money is needed more than ever - Europe is plunging into the biggest crisis of the century because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The European Commission collects an unprecedented 750 billion euros ($ 858 billion) to stimulate the economy, and therefore the question of raising taxes or at least improving their collection is very acute.

The case against Apple has been going on for more than one year, and he can’t see the end: the court’s decision will certainly be challenged and will reach the highest court of the EU. Which will take a few more years.

It all began four years ago when the EU decided that Ireland illegally gave Apple 13 billion euros ($ 14,9 billion) in tax benefits and decided to take the subsidy back. For the released four months this did not happen, and the EU went to court. Two years later, the American company transferred the amount with interest - 14,3 billion euros ($ 16,3 billion) - to a special account. Money languishes there awaiting the outcome of the lawsuit.

The judges decided that the EU could not prove Ireland’s special attitude towards Apple.

On the subject: Apple announced a contest for the best night photo taken on the iPhone 11

In the fight against international companies, Europe now yields to them with a score of 1-2: earlier the same court overturned a similar decision regarding the American Starbucks coffee shop chain, but supported the EU in a dispute with the Fiat Chrysler auto giant over tax breaks in Luxembourg. True, in both cases it was a question of an order of magnitude lower - about 30 million euros ($ 34 million).

"Political bullshit"

The EU seeks a more honest distribution of tax revenues between the 27 countries of the bloc and, in the long run, global tax justice, when international companies pay taxes where they earn. This is an understandable policy for the largest and richest single market on the planet: 450 million people, the second largest economy after the US - more than 30 thousand euros ($ 34 thousand) per capita per year.

In the EU there is a huge solvent demand for the goods and services of international companies, but social spending is high, so taxes in most countries of the block bite. It is much more profitable for business to sell in the EU, and to bring profits offshore, or at least to those countries where it is possible to agree with the authorities on preferences and benefits. The EU really dislikes this. He is trying to reduce losses, and the main goal has long been American companies.

For Americans, EU methods seem clumsy. Both companies and the White House call tax matters political.

“Political nonsense. They took some kind of figure out of my head. This is wrong, said Apple CEO Tim Cook in an interview with an Irish newspaper after an EU decision. - Most of all, I am outraged that the decision was politically motivated, I am absolutely sure of this. There were no factual or legal grounds. ”

The head of Apple found an unconventional ally - US President Donald Trump, who in the face called Cook "Tim Apple". Trump took up arms against Margrethe Westager, who for many years led the EU antitrust vendetta in the rank of European Commissioner responsible for competition.

“It seems I have never met a man who hates the United States so much. What is she doing with us! She drags all of ours to court, - Trump said. “They're suing Apple.” They are suing everyone. ”

"Aggressive tax optimization"

The resistance of other countries does not allow the EU to move the idea of ​​a single international approach to taxation of multinational companies, primarily Internet giants, from the dead point. The European Commission is not going to retreat, but so far there is a lull on the outer front, it has focused on the inside. On Wednesday, July 15, when the court ruled in the key case of this campaign, the EU announced another batch of measures aimed at combating tax evasion.

According to estimates by various European institutions, the EU loses 150 billion euros ($ 171 billion) per year in frank fraud with VAT within the union. And quite legitimate schemes of “aggressive optimization” of taxes by citizens annually cost 46 billion euros ($ 52,6 billion), from companies - 50-70 billion euros ($ 57-80 billion).

On the subject: Check your basement: Apple's old tech can cost up to a million dollars

To eliminate distortions in the internal single market, the friendly consent of 27 members of the union, including those who benefit from them, is needed. Therefore, success in this matter is still relative. The European Commission outlined the main goals of the campaign in May, pointing out loopholes in the tax laws of six countries: Cyprus, Hungary, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands and all the same Ireland.

Ireland collects about 60 billion euros ($ 68,6 billion) of taxes annually, and 13 billion euros ($ 14,9 billion) for her is a gigantic amount equal to two months of all her income or almost three months of tax revenues. However, in a dispute with the EU, she is on the side of Apple, defending the legality of two tax agreements with an American company, to which the commission found fault.

Apple agreed with the Irish back in 1991, and the tax treaty - quite legal for itself under EU standards - was updated in 2007. Only in 2013 the European Commission became interested in it.

Apple almost immediately changed the mechanism for distributing profits from European operations, and the agreement with Ireland ceased to operate in 2015 - a year before the EU’s order to return 13 billion euros of subsidies.

In this amount, according to the EU, European taxpayers cost Apple's tax deal with Ireland. And this is only in 10 years: the law allows the European Commission to demand the return of the subsidy no more than a decade before the first request for it, that is, from 2003 to 2013.

The EU’s goal is to protect free competition in the single European market by limiting subsidies to businesses from taxpayers. Ireland, according to European officials in Brussels, violated this principle. She allowed Apple to organize the withdrawal of all profits from European operations through an Irish company to a certain “head office”, and pay taxes only from 50 million euros ($ 57 million) - that is, about 10 million euros ($ 11,4) per year at the Irish tax rate at a profit.

In 2011 alone, Apple earned 16 billion euros in the EU and, thanks to an agreement with Ireland, paid only a fraction of a percent of this profit in the European Union, and brought 15,95 billion euros abroad.

Apple and US authorities say that taxes on withdrawn profits should have been paid at home in California, and the EU is a raider who is trying to keep the revenue of American business and taxpayers.

Miscellaneous Apple court World

Read also on ForumDaily:

11 tips for those who learn a foreign language on their own

15 free quarantined video viewing services

10 products not worth buying on Amazon

Research: can warming defeat coronavirus

Let's face the crisis together and support each other

Thank you for staying with us and trusting! Over the past 5 years, we have received a lot of grateful feedback from readers, whom our materials have helped to arrange life after moving to the USA. We have big plans, we don't want to stop or slow down the pace of work. Even now…

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected our income, and in order to stay afloat, we have to ask YOU for support. We will be grateful for any amount and will make every effort to continue to publish news and a lot of useful information just as quickly.

Thank you for being with us!

Always yours, ForumDaily! WomanForumDaily, NewYork, ForumDaily!

Security of contributions is guaranteed by the use of the highly secure Stripe system.

Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? Subscribe to our page in Facebook. Choose the option "Priority in the show" - and read us first. And don't forget to subscribe to ForumDaily Woman and ForumDaily New York - there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information.



1057 requests in 2,788 seconds.